DEMO
Your clubhouse.
Loading the latest league information…
DEMO
Loading the latest league information…
DEMO · Podcasts
Jack Mercer & Maya Brooks at the league desk.
← Back to the clubhouse2026 · Week 6 recap / Week 7 preview
Week 6 is in the books. Brett led the league with 156.30 points. The tightest matchup finished 0.14 points apart.
The recap is ready to read. Audio has not been published yet.
AI voices · Recap based on ESPN results. Scores can change after stat corrections.
Jack: Welcome back. I'm Jack Mercer with Maya Brooks. This is the DEMO weekly show: Week 6 recap and Week 7 look ahead. Week 6 is in the books. Brett led the league with 156.30 points. The tightest matchup finished 0.14 points apart.
Maya: The league averaged 111.69 points this week. We will compare each result with that baseline. Bench comparisons are hindsight; this feed cannot establish whether a different lineup was legal or sensible before kickoff. The scorecards and chapters follow the conversation, so you can jump directly to your team.
Jack: Let's go to Matthew and Mitchell. Matthew beat Mitchell, 99.32 to 81.30. The margin was 18.02 points. Even the higher score here was 12.37 below the league average.
Maya: For Matthew, the weekly scoring rank was 9 of 12. Their total would have beaten 3 of the other 11 teams. The leading starters were Jaxon Smith-Njigba, 25.40 points; Bhayshul Tuten, 24.70 points; Ashton Jeanty, 15.80 points. The top two combined for 50.10, 50 percent of the listed starters' scoring.
Jack: The RB group supplied 40.50 points from the listed starters. On the bench, Jakobi Meyers scored 13.30. That was 13.30 more than Rashee Rice, a starter at the same position. That is a hindsight gap; eligibility and availability remain unknown.
Jack: For Mitchell, the weekly scoring rank was 12 of 12. Their total would have beaten 0 of the other 11 teams. The leading starters were DK Metcalf, 20.30 points; Colston Loveland, 18.50 points; Alvin Kamara, 14.90 points. The top two combined for 38.80, 48 percent of the listed starters' scoring.
Maya: The WR group supplied 34.30 points from the listed starters. On the bench, Caleb Williams scored 16.50. That was 16.50 more than Joe Burrow, a starter at the same position. That is a hindsight gap; eligibility and availability remain unknown.
Maya: My takeaway from Matthew versus Mitchell is a win with below-average scoring. That total may not hold up next time.
Jack: Let's go to Cody and Camden. Cody beat Camden, 134.90 to 124.60. The margin was 10.30 points. Cody cleared the league scoring average by 23.21.
Maya: For Camden, the weekly scoring rank was 4 of 12. Their total would have beaten 8 of the other 11 teams. The leading starters were James Cook III, 24.30 points; Matthew Golden, 22.40 points; Josh Allen, 18.30 points. The top two combined for 46.70, 37 percent of the listed starters' scoring.
Jack: The WR group supplied 43.90 points from the listed starters. On the bench, Stefon Diggs scored 16.40. That was 10.70 more than A.J. Brown, a starter at the same position. That is a hindsight gap; eligibility and availability remain unknown. That gap exceeds the final margin, but does not prove a missed win.
Jack: For Cody, the weekly scoring rank was 2 of 12. Their total would have beaten 10 of the other 11 teams. The leading starters were Tre Tucker, 26.70 points; D'Andre Swift, 23.00 points; RJ Harvey, 14.60 points. The top two combined for 49.70, 37 percent of the listed starters' scoring.
Maya: The WR group supplied 57.90 points from the listed starters. On the bench, Rachaad White scored 15.70. That was 1.10 more than RJ Harvey, a starter at the same position. That is a hindsight gap; eligibility and availability remain unknown.
Maya: My takeaway from Cody versus Camden is a tough draw for the losing team: they still beat the league average.
Jack: Let's go to Carter and Bryan. Carter beat Bryan, 132.26 to 93.92. The margin was 38.34 points. Carter cleared the league scoring average by 20.57.
Maya: For Bryan, the weekly scoring rank was 10 of 12. Their total would have beaten 2 of the other 11 teams. The leading starters were Chuba Hubbard, 19.10 points; Carnell Tate, 19.00 points; Kirk Cousins, 18.52 points. The top two combined for 38.10, 41 percent of the listed starters' scoring.
Jack: The WR group supplied 34.70 points from the listed starters. On the bench, C.J. Stroud scored 22.98. That was 4.46 more than Kirk Cousins, a starter at the same position. That is a hindsight gap; eligibility and availability remain unknown.
Jack: For Carter, the weekly scoring rank was 3 of 12. Their total would have beaten 9 of the other 11 teams. The leading starters were Christian McCaffrey, 30.70 points; Isaiah Likely, 23.90 points; Brock Purdy, 17.36 points. The top two combined for 54.60, 41 percent of the listed starters' scoring.
Maya: The RB group supplied 39.50 points from the listed starters. On the bench, Josh Downs scored 8.70. That alone does not establish a better legal lineup.
Maya: My takeaway from Carter versus Bryan is a clear scoring gap this week, with plenty of season left for both rosters.
Jack: Let's go to Tanner and Mike. Tanner beat Mike, 103.60 to 86.54. The margin was 17.06 points. Even the higher score here was 8.09 below the league average.
Maya: For Mike, the weekly scoring rank was 11 of 12. Their total would have beaten 1 of the other 11 teams. The leading starters were Jordan Love, 20.24 points; Luther Burden III, 17.50 points; Zay Flowers, 12.70 points. The top two combined for 37.74, 44 percent of the listed starters' scoring.
Jack: The WR group supplied 32.90 points from the listed starters. On the bench, Blake Corum scored 14.00. That was 13.00 more than MarShawn Lloyd, a starter at the same position. That is a hindsight gap; eligibility and availability remain unknown.
Jack: For Tanner, the weekly scoring rank was 8 of 12. Their total would have beaten 4 of the other 11 teams. The leading starters were Jayden Daniels, 21.00 points; Emeka Egbuka, 17.80 points; Chase McLaughlin, 17.00 points. The top two combined for 38.80, 37 percent of the listed starters' scoring.
Maya: The WR group supplied 38.60 points from the listed starters. On the bench, Dontayvion Wicks scored 4.40. That alone does not establish a better legal lineup.
Maya: My takeaway from Tanner versus Mike is a win with below-average scoring. That total may not hold up next time.
Jack: Let's go to Devon and TJ. Devon beat TJ, 106.88 to 106.74. The margin was 0.14 points. Even the higher score here was 4.81 below the league average.
Maya: For TJ, the weekly scoring rank was 7 of 12. Their total would have beaten 5 of the other 11 teams. The leading starters were Trevor Lawrence, 27.34 points; DeVonta Smith, 20.50 points; Khalil Shakir, 13.40 points. The top two combined for 47.84, 45 percent of the listed starters' scoring.
Jack: The WR group supplied 37.80 points from the listed starters. On the bench, Tyler Shough scored 26.96. That alone does not establish a better legal lineup.
Jack: For Devon, the weekly scoring rank was 6 of 12. Their total would have beaten 6 of the other 11 teams. The leading starters were Germie Bernard, 25.70 points; Hunter Henry, 14.80 points; Chris Olave, 14.30 points. The top two combined for 40.50, 38 percent of the listed starters' scoring.
Maya: The WR group supplied 42.50 points from the listed starters. On the bench, Keon Coleman scored 15.90. That was 13.40 more than Denzel Boston, a starter at the same position. That is a hindsight gap; eligibility and availability remain unknown. That gap exceeds the final margin, but does not prove a missed win.
Maya: My takeaway from Devon versus TJ is a win with below-average scoring. That total may not hold up next time.
Jack: Let's go to Brett and Austin. Brett beat Austin, 156.30 to 113.88. The margin was 42.42 points. Brett cleared the league scoring average by 44.61.
Maya: For Austin, the weekly scoring rank was 5 of 12. Their total would have beaten 7 of the other 11 teams. The leading starters were George Kittle, 17.90 points; Matthew Stafford, 16.88 points; CeeDee Lamb, 16.00 points. The top two combined for 34.78, 31 percent of the listed starters' scoring.
Jack: The WR group supplied 51.80 points from the listed starters. On the bench, Kenny Gainwell scored 3.40. That was 3.20 more than Najee Harris, a starter at the same position. That is a hindsight gap; eligibility and availability remain unknown.
Jack: For Brett, the weekly scoring rank was 1 of 12. Their total would have beaten 11 of the other 11 teams. The leading starters were Malik Nabers, 28.50 points; Kenneth Walker III, 27.90 points; Drake Maye, 23.80 points. The top two combined for 56.40, 36 percent of the listed starters' scoring.
Maya: The RB group supplied 64.00 points from the listed starters. On the bench, Bryce Young scored 19.84. That alone does not establish a better legal lineup.
Maya: My takeaway from Brett versus Austin is a tough draw for the losing team: they still beat the league average.
Jack: Across the full league, here is the weekly performance board. Number 1, Brett, 156.30 points. Number 2, Cody, 134.90 points. Number 3, Carter, 132.26 points. Number 4, Camden, 124.60 points. Number 5, Austin, 113.88 points. Number 6, Devon, 106.88 points. Number 7, TJ, 106.74 points. Number 8, Tanner, 103.60 points. Number 9, Matthew, 99.32 points. Number 10, Bryan, 93.92 points. Number 11, Mike, 86.54 points. Number 12, Mitchell, 81.30 points. These are completed-week scoring ranks, not championship probabilities.
Maya: The highest and lowest scores were 156.30 and 81.30, a spread of 75.00. Cody moved up 3 places from the previous weekly board. Carter moved down 1 places from the previous weekly board. Camden moved down 1 places from the previous weekly board. Austin moved up 4 places from the previous weekly board. Devon moved up 1 places from the previous weekly board. TJ moved down 1 places from the previous weekly board. Tanner moved down 4 places from the previous weekly board. Matthew moved up 1 places from the previous weekly board. Bryan moved up 2 places from the previous weekly board. Mike moved down 3 places from the previous weekly board. Mitchell moved down 1 places from the previous weekly board.
Jack: On the Week 7 slate: Mitchell against Camden. Their completed-week totals were 81.30 and 124.60. That gives Camden the recent-scoring edge by 43.30 points. This is a form-only comparison, not a win probability.
Maya: The weekly ranks were 12 and 4. One side cleared the league average while the other fell short.
Jack: On the Week 7 slate: Cody against Bryan. Their completed-week totals were 134.90 and 93.92. That gives Cody the recent-scoring edge by 40.98 points. This is a form-only comparison, not a win probability.
Maya: The weekly ranks were 2 and 10. One side cleared the league average while the other fell short.
Jack: On the Week 7 slate: Carter against Mike. Their completed-week totals were 132.26 and 86.54. That gives Carter the recent-scoring edge by 45.72 points. This is a form-only comparison, not a win probability.
Maya: The weekly ranks were 3 and 11. One side cleared the league average while the other fell short.
Jack: On the Week 7 slate: Tanner against TJ. Their completed-week totals were 103.60 and 106.74. That gives TJ the recent-scoring edge by 3.14 points. This is a form-only comparison, not a win probability.
Maya: The weekly ranks were 8 and 7. Both teams have room to improve on below-average scoring weeks.
Jack: On the Week 7 slate: Devon against Austin. Their completed-week totals were 106.88 and 113.88. That gives Austin the recent-scoring edge by 7.00 points. This is a form-only comparison, not a win probability.
Maya: The weekly ranks were 6 and 5. One side cleared the league average while the other fell short.
Jack: On the Week 7 slate: Brett against Matthew. Their completed-week totals were 156.30 and 99.32. That gives Brett the recent-scoring edge by 56.98 points. This is a form-only comparison, not a win probability.
Maya: The weekly ranks were 1 and 9. One side cleared the league average while the other fell short.
Jack: That is the Week 6 review. I'm Jack Mercer.
Maya: And I'm Maya Brooks. Replay your matchup from the chapters, and find full box scores in the Matchup Center. These are AI voices reading a data-based league recap. Stat corrections can change official scores after recording. Thanks for listening.
Week 6 performance rankings
Sorted by completed-week points, with equal ranks for tied scores. These are weekly results, not projections or title odds.